The current handling of the operators ||, && and ?: has a number of false
positive and false negative. The issues for operator || and && are:

1. We need to add sequencing regions for the LHS and RHS as is done for the
   comma operator. Not doing so causes false positives in expressions like
   `((a++, false) || (a++, false))` (from PR39779, see PR22197 for another
    example).

2. In the current implementation when the evaluation of the LHS fails, the RHS
   is added to a worklist to be processed later. This results in false negatives
   in expressions like `(a && a++) + a`.

Fix these issues by introducing sequencing regions for the LHS and RHS, and by
not deferring the visitation of the RHS.

The issues with the ternary operator ?: are similar, with the added twist that
we should not warn on expressions like `(x ? y += 1 : y += 2)` since exactly
one of the 2nd and 3rd expression is going to be evaluated, but we should still
warn on expressions like `(x ? y += 1 : y += 2) = y`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57747

Reviewed By: rsmith